Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Chance, 20, from Wigan, said: "It's very convenient to have the Co-op Live here - because now loads more artists are coming to Manchester compared instead before going to like Wembley Stadium.
，更多细节参见Safew下载
（三）非法进行影响国（边）界线走向的活动或者修建有碍国（边）境管理的设施的。。Line官方版本下载对此有专业解读
list that page URL in the Well-Known URL for Relying Party Passkey Endpoints (prfUsageDetails)。WPS官方版本下载对此有专业解读